Alright yeah so looks like the issue is with the sims and not with our clauses :S the 'clause' will be unmentioned on PP from now on, except in the context of Stadium.
Tournaments
Check out the 2024 Tournament Calendar and join our discord server to participate in our tournaments!
Alright yeah so looks like the issue is with the sims and not with our clauses :S the 'clause' will be unmentioned on PP from now on, except in the context of Stadium.
Now, we could dismiss this as just a draw, but we could alternatively view it as new territory:
Win for player and Win for opponent = +1, +1 = double win = 2
Win for player and Draw for opponent = +1, +0 = win+draw = 1
Win for player and Loss for opponent = +1, -1 = win/loss = 0
Draw for player and Win for opponent = +0, +1 = win+draw = 1
Draw for player and Draw for opponent = +0, +0 = draw = 0
Draw for player and Loss for opponent = +0, -1 = loss+draw = -1
Loss for player and Win for opponent = -1, +1 = win/loss = 0
Loss for player and Draw for opponent = -1, +0 = loss+draw = -1
Loss for player and Loss for opponent = -1,-1 = double loss = -2
We're saying that the sim will do what is done on cart w.r.t. these endgame scenarios, no need for any sort of clause by the looks of things.Hang on, are you saying it's being removed or that it'll be implemented without being mentioned as Marco and I said? Because the scenario in which we said that has been proven wrong by Crystal and Marco himself.
We're saying that the sim will do what is done on cart w.r.t. these endgame scenarios, no need for any sort of clause by the looks of things.
If both players 'lose', then it's a tie.
I think maybe we should just review this once we have a sim that does stuff correctly in the first place, lol.While I agree, it should probably still be put to a vote as Self-KO Clause was originally implemented for other reasons than Marco's mistaken one (avoiding draws and punishing last-mon Explosion).
Of course, given that I now vote "no", Marco's changed his vote to "no", and it sounds like you're also changing your vote to "no", I have my suspicions about which way that vote's going to go. But it's the principle of the thing.![]()
If it's not supported on cartridges I don't think we should, since I think it's something that's fairly arbitrary and artificial, but nonetheless capable of having a significant impact on a series (and by extension, tour). If you're in a position where you've earned a draw, that's what you should get.
I think it's time to start discussing again. This rule ruins bo1 tours and cups where is more important to get as more wins as possible.
It wasn't an April Fools' Day joke but I don't really think anyone wants to follow it, what cart does matters more to us than what Nintendo says anyway.@Pie - please confirm that your post on April 1 was not an April Fools' Day joke. Only then will I discuss its ramifications.