No, you didn't. You made a unilateral declaration that is not remotely a consensus among those who actually care about principled tiering.I said it's possibly the case
Tournaments
Check out the 2025 Tournament Calendar and join our discord server to participate in our tournaments!
No, you didn't. You made a unilateral declaration that is not remotely a consensus among those who actually care about principled tiering.I said it's possibly the case
Legacy tiers still exist lol.
No, you didn't. You made a unilateral declaration that is not remotely a consensus among those who actually care about principled tiering.
In GSC's case this is a straight-up lie and you know it. "No playerbase to test it" is a reasonable thing to say, simply declaring it suitable is a load of shit.1 - RBY & possibly GSC are already suitably tiered, irrespective of the Established Old Generations exception.
Hmm. Well, I've always been in favour of keeping them.Yeah they exist because we argued in favor of them lol. When I made that post it was really up in the air with it basically being relegated to small tours in the tournament's subforum.
That's odd. I looked for such a qualifier before making that post. Perhaps I am going blind.snip
Zapdos Thunder vs. Ho-Oh: 224-264 (53.9 - 63.6%)Ho-Oh doesn't stall Zapdos out of Thunder because paralysis and crits exist.
Which part of "paralysis and crits exist" did you miss? Also, which part of "start with Ubers" did you miss?Zapdos Thunder vs. Ho-Oh: 224-264 (53.9 - 63.6%)
this is also a move that misses 30% of the time and has 16 pp (sure sleep talk exists but... come on) if you want to bring odds into it. but anyway the point isn't ho-oh can go 1 on 1 with zapdos. the point is something as powerful as this gets shrugged off like nothing. hooh can stay in several times and come out no worse for wear while zap wastes pp. nice try though